{"id":14139,"date":"2020-05-14T01:19:05","date_gmt":"2020-05-14T00:19:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?page_id=14139"},"modified":"2026-03-17T13:06:18","modified_gmt":"2026-03-17T12:06:18","slug":"archives","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?page_id=14139","title":{"rendered":"Archive"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2 class=\"archive-title\">Volume 4, issue 1 (2026)<\/h2><ul><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=21395>Should We Worry About Problematic Response Behaviour in Social Media Surveys? Understanding the Impact of Social Group Cues in Recruitment<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Zaza Zindel<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=21010>From Face-to-Face to Push-to-Web: Methodological Lessons from the Transition of the \u201cSocial Survey Austria&#8221;<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Matthias Penker | Anja Eder | Markus Hadler<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=21234>Effects of QR codes in a political science probability-based web survey<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Oliver Lipps | Anke Tresch | Louis Durussel<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=20647>Who are the online panelists and why they cannot represent the general population<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">St\u00e9phane Legleye | Guillaume Chauvet | Thomas Merly-Alpa | No\u00e9mie Soullier<\/span><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">Volume 3, issue 3 (2025): Special issue \"Advancing Comparative Research: Exploring Error and Quality Indicators in Social Research\"<\/h2><ul><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=21974>Editorial \u2013 Advancing Comparative Research: Toward a Methodological Framework for Valid Comparative Inference<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Heinz Leitg\u00f6b | Stefanie Kley | Katharina Meitinger | Natalja Menold<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=20144>Measurement Invariance and Maximal Reliability: Exploring a Potential Link<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Tenko Raykov  | Natalja Menold <\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=20179>The Relationship Between Measurement Error, Representation Bias, Language, and Country: A Comparative Analysis Using the European Social Survey (Rounds 5 to 7)<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Lydia Repke | Barbara Felderer<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=19796>A myriad of options: Validity and comparability of alternative international education variables<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Silke L. Schneider | Julian Urban<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=20280>The MAUP Effect: Spatial Scale and the Reliability of Segregation Indices<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Hinrich Wildfang<\/span><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">Volume 3, issue 2 (2025)<\/h2><ul><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=21128>Challenges Conducting Cognitive Interviews in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Case Study with Older Adults in Lebanon<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Alexandra Abi Nassif  | Mayssan Kabalan | Carlos Mendes de Leon | Julie de Jong | Frederick Conrad * |  | * Corresponding author | Note: A. Abi Nassif & M. Kabalan contributed equally to this work.<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=20106>Mitigating Fraud in Incentivized Online Surveys: Lessons from Facebook Recruitment in Nigeria<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Arnim Langer | Lucas Leopold | Bart Meuleman | Line Kuppens | Abhishegh Menon<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=20596>Examining Predictors of Unsuccessful Mail Delivery for a National Address-Based Sample During the COVID-19 Pandemic<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Raphael Nishimura | Rebecca Gatward | Brady T. West | Htay-Wah Saw<\/span><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">Volume 3, issue 1 (2025)<\/h2><ul><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=20157>Does matching interviewer and respondent gender improve data quality and reduce social desirability bias? Evidence from a mobile phone survey in India<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Payal Hathi | Diane Coffey | Amit Thorat | Amanda Nagle<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=20208>Who chooses a QR code over a URL to access a web screener in a national probability survey of older adults, and the impact on data quality<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Andrew L. Hupp | Heather M. Schroeder | Brady T. West | Eva Leissou | David R. Weir<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=19802>Effects of mode and incentives on response rate, sample composition, and costs \u2013 experience from a self-administered mixed-mode survey of movers<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Manuela Schmidt | Alice Barth | J\u00f6rg Blasius<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=19898>Is it Helpful to Include QR Codes on Mail Contact Materials for Self-Administered Web Surveys?<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Taylor Lewis | Nicole Lee | Dain Palmer | Hannah Matzke | Nik Prachand<\/span><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">Volume 2, issue 2 (2024)<\/h2><ul><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=19515>The Effect of Operationalization on the Correlation between Objective and Subjective Socioeconomic Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Luise Richter | Natalja Menold<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=16162>Using surveys to assess students&#8217; political knowledge: Evidence of a gender gap or disparate response styles?<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Christa E. Winkler<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=19389>The Effect of Quick Response (QR) Codes on Response Rates and Respondent Composition: Results from a Statewide Experiment<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Kyle Endres | Erin O. Heiden | Ki Park<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=19354>Time and sample quality in a Facebook ad-generated survey with Polish migrants in the UK<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Aneta Piekut | <\/span><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">Volume 2, issue 1 (2024)<\/h2><ul><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=19071>Do Question Topic and Placement Shape Survey Breakoff Rates?<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Luke Plutowski | Elizabeth J. Zechmeister<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=18408>Asking Volunteers: Pitfalls and Solutions for Surveying Voluntary Organisations in Germany<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Christoph Thewes<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=19154>Ten Hypotheses Generated for Increasing Survey Response Propensity Among Immigrants and Inhabitants of Socially Disadvantaged Areas<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Nora Theorin | Sebastian Lundmark<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=18437>Designing Effective Mobile Phone Surveys: Insights from Mozambique on Optimizing Call Attempts and Evaluating Response, Refusal, and Contact Rates among Refugees and Asylum Seekers<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Ilgi Bozdag | Hyunju Park<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=18357>A Multimode Strategy to Contact Participants and Collect Responses in a Supplement to a Longitudinal Household Survey<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Angie Kistler | Sandra Decker | Darby Steiger | Jessica Novik<\/span><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">Volume 1, issue 3 (2023): Special issue on Food Acquisition Research and Methods<\/h2><ul><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=19311>Editorial: Recent Advances in Survey Methods for Collecting Food Data<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Elina T. Page | Christopher Antoun | Jeffrey Gonzalez | Linda Kantor | Florian Keusch | Lauren Miller | Alexander Wenz<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=17488>Usability of Augmented-Reality Portion Estimators During 24-hour Dietary Recall Interviews<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Laura DiGrande | Shawn Karns | Elizabeth Kinyara | Sue Pedrazzani<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=17465>Secondary Activities: Their Proximity to Primary Activities and Their Importance for Understanding Reports of Preparing and Consuming Meals<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Robert G. Rinderknecht | Long Doan | Liana C. Sayer<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=17458>Review of Food Diaries Used to Collect Food Acquisition Data<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Ting Yan | Janice Machado<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=17190>Exploring Optical Character Recognition (OCR) as a Method of Capturing Data from Food-Purchase Receipts<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Adam Kaderabek<\/span><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">Volume 1, issue 2 (2023)<\/h2><ul><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=18071>Willingness to Consent to Data Linkage in Austria \u2013 Results of a Pilot Study on Hypothetical Willingness for Different Domains<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Johann Bacher<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=18404>Targeting Incentives in Mature Probability-based Online Panels<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Oliver Lipps | Max Felder | Lukas Lauener | Anna Meisser | Nicolas Pekari | Line Rennwald | Anke Tresch<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=17319>Challenges in sampling students with and without special educational needs in inclusive settings for an educational longitudinal study<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Monja Schmitt | Cornelia Gresch | Amelie Labsch<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=18304>Predicting panel attrition using multiple operationalisations of response time<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Isabella Minderop<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=17985>Flying blind: Survey research among methadone and buprenorphine providers in Arizona<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Brady Benjamin | Meyerson Beth E. | Bentele Keith G. | *Corresponding author\r<\/span><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">Volume 1, issue 1 (2023)<\/h2><ul><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=17948>Questionnaire design in the FReDA panel recruitment: Challenges in transitioning from a face-to-face to a self-administered mixed-mode design<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Lisa Schmid | Tanja Kunz | Elias Naumann<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=17866>Design of multiple open-ended probes in cognitive online pretests using web probing<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Cornelia Neuert | Timo Lenzner<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=17502>Does the type of return postage affect response rates in follow-up mailings? Experimental findings from a citizen satisfaction survey<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Russell E. Ward<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=16770>Presentation Format Differences in Factorial Surveys: Written Vignettes Versus Photo Vignettes<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Stefanie Eifler | Knut Petzold | Miryam Verbeek-Teres<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=16640>Satisficing Behaviour in Web Surveys. Results from a Comparison of Web and Paper Mode across Four National Survey Experiments<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Sanne Lund Clement | Majbritt Kappelgaard Severin-Nielsen | Ditte Shamshiri-Petersen<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=15753>The Randomized Overclaiming Method (ROME): A paradigm for assessing the validity of social desirability reduction techniques using objective measures<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Patrick Schnapp<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=16532>The most successful interviewers in income questions: A SHARE study<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Cl\u00e1udia Cunha | Alice Delerue Matos | Gina Voss<\/span><\/li><\/ul>\n<h2 class=\"archive-title\">2022<\/h2><ul><li>22\/12\/22<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=16693>An overview of the scales&#8217; characteristics for 10 well-established face-to-face social science surveys<\/a><\/li><li>20\/12\/22<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=16480>Optimizing Advance Letters: Findings From a Cognitive Pretest<\/a><\/li><li>12\/12\/22<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=17115>Cost Efficiency of Incentives in Mature Probability-based Online Panels<\/a><\/li><li>08\/12\/22<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=16622>Are you listening? Examining the level of multitasking and distractions and their impact on data quality in a telephone survey<\/a><\/li><li>06\/12\/22<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=16588>Binary response format or 11-point scale? Measuring justice evaluations of earnings in the SOEP<\/a><\/li><li>28\/11\/22<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=17134>An Experiment Comparing Concurrent and Sequential Choice+ Mixed-Mode Data Collection Protocols in a Self-Administered Health Survey<\/a><\/li><li>22\/09\/22<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=16931>Family Forms Survey: Identifying Donor-Conceived Offspring, Donors, and Recipients in a National Panel<\/a><\/li><li>29\/03\/22<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=15979>The effect of advance letters on survey participation: The case of Ireland and the European Social Survey<\/a><\/li><li>25\/01\/22<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=16730>Measurement Challenges in Designing and Conducting Surveys on Urban Population: Experience from Bangladesh Urban Health Surveys<\/a><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">2021<\/h2><ul><li>12\/10\/21<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=14864>Revisiting the ESS R8 sample a year after &#8211; Lessons from a re-contact survey to test patterns of unit non-response in Hungary<\/a><\/li><li>01\/10\/21<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=15407>Respondent Understanding of Data Linkage Consent<\/a><\/li><li>30\/08\/21<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=15510>How does switching a Probability-Based Online Panel to a Smartphone-Optimized Design Affect Response Rates and Smartphone Use?<\/a><\/li><li>14\/06\/21<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=14270>Using Record Linkage to improve matching rates of subject-generated ID-codes \u2013 A practical example from a panel study in schools<\/a><\/li><li>07\/06\/21<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=15306>The Interviewer Performance Profile (IPP): A Paradata-Driven Tool for Monitoring and Managing Interviewer Performance<\/a><\/li><li>28\/05\/21<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=15709>Integrating online data collection in a household panel study: effects on second-wave participation<\/a><\/li><li>18\/05\/21<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=15281>Sequentially mixing modes in an election survey<\/a><\/li><li>17\/05\/21<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=14494>Shaking hands in a busy waiting room. The effects of the surveyor\u2019s introduction and people present in the waiting room on the response rate<\/a><\/li><li>12\/02\/21<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=14216>Do shorter stated survey length and inclusion of a QR code in an invitation letter lead to better response rates?<\/a><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">2020<\/h2><ul><li>10\/12\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=14659>Multi-mode question pretesting: Using traditional cognitive interviews and online testing as complementary methods<\/a><\/li><li>10\/12\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13405>Using Geofences to Collect Survey Data: Lessons Learned From the IAB-SMART Study<\/a><\/li><li>10\/12\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13330>Collecting and using always-on location data in surveys<\/a><\/li><li>10\/12\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13446>Page switching in mixed-device web surveys: prevalence and data quality<\/a><\/li><li>10\/12\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13585>Device effects on survey response quality. A comparison of smartphone, tablet and PC responses on a cross sectional probability sample<\/a><\/li><li>10\/12\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13551>Text Message (SMS) Pre-notifications, Invitations and Reminders for Web Surveys<\/a><\/li><li>10\/12\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13426>Comparison of Quarterly and Yearly Calibration Data for Propensity Score Adjusted Web Survey Estimates<\/a><\/li><li>10\/12\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13558>Using Facebook and Instagram to Recruit Web Survey Participants: A Step-by-Step Guide and Application<\/a><\/li><li>10\/12\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=15106>Editorial: From web surveys to mobile web to apps, sensors, and digital traces<\/a><\/li><li>10\/12\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=15174>Special issue: Advancements in Online and Mobile Survey Methods<\/a><\/li><li>24\/11\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=14420>Letting the cat out of the bag: The impact of respondent multitasking on disclosure of socially undesirable information and answers to knowledge questions<\/a><\/li><li>15\/10\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13652>Just a Difficult Election to Poll? How Context Affects Polling Accuracy<\/a><\/li><li>31\/08\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13478>Do supplemental list frames for subpopulations increase subpopulation sampling efficiency? Evidence from the National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey<\/a><\/li><li>23\/07\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13357>Assessing Nonresponse Bias by Permitting Individuals to Opt Out of a Survey<\/a><\/li><li>07\/07\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13222>The Impact of Nurse Continuity on Biosocial Survey Participation<\/a><\/li><li>18\/05\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13996>Special issue: Fieldwork Monitoring Strategies for Interviewer-Administered Surveys<\/a><\/li><li>18\/05\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13732>Fieldwork Monitoring Strategies for Interviewer-Administered Surveys<\/a><\/li><li>18\/05\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=12401>Using Geospatial Data to Monitor and Optimize Face-to-Face Fieldwork<\/a><\/li><li>18\/05\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=11714>Developments in fieldwork procedures and monitoring in longitudinal surveys: case prioritisation and electronic contact sheets on the UK Millennium Cohort Study<\/a><\/li><li>18\/05\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=12720>Using field monitoring strategies to improve panel sample representativeness: Application during data collection in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE)<\/a><\/li><li>18\/05\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=11703>Converting Nonrespondents in PIAAC Germany 2012 Using Responsive Measures<\/a><\/li><li>18\/05\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=11849>The utility of auxiliary data for survey response modeling: Evidence from the German Internet Panel<\/a><\/li><li>18\/05\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=11866>Improving Central Monitoring of Fieldwork in Cross-national Surveys: The Case of the Fieldwork Management System in the European Social Survey<\/a><\/li><li>18\/05\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=12237>Fieldwork Monitoring in Practice:  Insights from 17 Large-scale Social Science Surveys in Germany<\/a><\/li><li>05\/03\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=12496>Method and transparency of online physician surveys: an overview<\/a><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">2019<\/h2><ul><li>22\/10\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=12538>Effective Strategies for Recording Interviewer Observations:  Evidence from the PASS Study in Germany<\/a><\/li><li>15\/08\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=12603>Analysing Poor Reading Skills: A Comparison Between PIAAC Literacy Levels and Reading components<\/a><\/li><li>17\/05\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=12423>Comparison response patterns on landline and cell phone in a call back survey: effects of demographic characteristics and lag days<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=11275>Undercoverage of the elderly institutionalized population: The risk of biased estimates and the potentials of weighting<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=11822>How to reach \u2018hard-to-reach\u2019 older people for research: The TIBaR model of recruitment<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=11064>Interviewing elderly in nursing homes \u2013 Respondent and survey characteristics as predictors of item nonresponse<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10841>Effects of a sequential mixed-mode design on participation, contact and sample composition \u2013 Results of the pilot study \u201cIMOA &#8211; Improving Health Monitoring in Old Age\u201d<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10807>Including nursing home residents in a general population health survey in Germany<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=11416>Sampling in Times of High Immigration: The Survey Process of the IAB-BAMF-SOEP Survey of Refugees<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=12000>How to Implement Respondent-Driven Sampling in Practice: Insights from Surveying 24-Hour Migrant Home Care Workers<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10741>Sampling Refugees for an Educational Longitudinal Survey<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10641>Building a Sampling Frame for Migrant Populations via an Onomastic Approach \u2013 Lesson learned from the Austrian Immigrant Survey 2016<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10780>Integration of Migrant Populations into Health Monitoring in Germany: Results from a Feasibility Study<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10812>From peer to peer: Reaching migrants from sub-Saharan Africa with research on sexual health utilizing community-based participatory health research<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=11959>Needles in Haystacks and Diamonds in the Rough: Using Probability and Nonprobability Methods to Survey Low-incidence Populations<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10433>Measuring sexual behaviours and attitudes in hard-to-reach groups. A comparison of a non-probability web survey with a national probability sample survey<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10981>Possible Uses of Nonprobability Sampling for the Social Sciences<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=11203>Inferences based on Probability Sampling or Nonprobability Sampling \u2013 Are They Nothing but a Question of Models?<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=12070>Probability and Nonprobability Sampling: Representative Surveys of hard-to-reach and hard-to-ask populations. Current surveys between the poles of theory and practice<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=12100>Special issue: &#8216;Probability and Nonprobability Sampling: Sampling of hard-to-reach survey populations&#8217;<\/a><\/li><li>22\/03\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10323>Pouring water into wine: revisiting the advantages of the crosswise model for asking sensitive questions<\/a><\/li><li>22\/02\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10663>Trust and Credibility in the U.S. Federal Statistical System<\/a><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">2018<\/h2><ul><li>20\/12\/18<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10452>International Nonresponse Trends across Countries and Years: An analysis of 36 years of Labour Force Survey data<\/a><\/li><li>16\/11\/18<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10422>Validating occupational coding indexes for use in multi-country surveys<\/a><\/li><li>15\/11\/18<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10945>Investigating Respondent Multitasking and Distraction Using Self-reports and Interviewers\u2019 Observations in a Dual-frame Telephone Survey<\/a><\/li><li>27\/07\/18<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10051>Evaluation of Gaining Cooperation Methods for IVR Surveys in Low- and Middle-income Countries<\/a><\/li><li>18\/05\/18<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=9734>Collecting Multiple Data Linkage Consents in a Mixed-mode Survey: Evidence from a large-scale longitudinal study in the UK<\/a><\/li><li>20\/04\/18<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=9673>Response Rates in the European Social Survey: Increasing, Decreasing, or a Matter of Fieldwork Efforts?<\/a><\/li><li>15\/03\/18<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=9237>\u2018Don\u2019t Know\u2019 Responses to Survey Items on Trust in Police and Criminal Courts: A Word of Caution<\/a><\/li><li>23\/01\/18<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=9435>The Need to Account for Complex Sampling Features when Analyzing Establishment Survey Data:  An Illustration using the 2013 Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey (BRDIS)<\/a><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">2017<\/h2><ul><li>07\/12\/17<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=8195>Why were there three? &#8211; Determinants of the presence of an intimate partner during face-to-face interviews<\/a><\/li><li>01\/12\/17<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=8625>A Review of Reporting Standards in Academic Journals \u2013   A Research Note<\/a><\/li><li>16\/11\/17<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=8217>Does name order still matter for candidates in a presidential primary poll in the US? Lack of response order effect in a web survey experiment<\/a><\/li><li>10\/10\/17<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=8480>Measuring Immigrant Populations: Subjective versus Objective Assessments<\/a><\/li><li>21\/09\/17<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=9044>Effects of call patterns on the likelihood of contact and of interview in mobile CATI surveys<\/a><\/li><li>24\/08\/17<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=8708>Comparing Continuous and Dichotomous Scoring of Social Desirability Scales: Effects of Different Scoring Methods on the Reliability and Validity of the Winkler-Kroh-Spiess BIDR Short Scale<\/a><\/li><li>16\/05\/17<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=8887>Testing the Validity of the Crosswise Model: A Study on Attitudes Towards Muslims<\/a><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">2016<\/h2><ul><li>06\/12\/16<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=7860>Nonsampling errors and their implication for estimates of current cancer treatment using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey<\/a><\/li><li>01\/11\/16<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=7645>Question Order Experiments in the German-European Context<\/a><\/li><li>06\/10\/16<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=7587>The effect of interviewers\u2019 motivation and attitudes on respondents\u2018 consent to contact secondary respondents in a multi-actor design<\/a><\/li><li>01\/07\/16<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=7794>A Case Study of Error in Survey Reports of Move Month Using the U.S. Postal Service Change of Address Records<\/a><\/li><li>08\/06\/16<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=7430>Measuring the survey climate: the Flemish case<\/a><\/li><li>17\/05\/16<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=7650>Web survey experiments on fully balanced, minimally balanced and unbalanced rating scales<\/a><\/li><li>09\/05\/16<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=7031>Comparing smartphones to tablets for face-to-face interviewing in Kenya<\/a><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">2015<\/h2><ul><li>18\/12\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=7324>Altering the Survey-taking Climate: The Case of the 2010 U.S. Census<\/a><\/li><li>20\/11\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=6899>What do web survey panel respondents answer when asked \u201cDo you have any other comment?\u201d<\/a><\/li><li>13\/11\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=7288>Obtaining Record Linkage Consent: Results from a Wording Experiment in Germany<\/a><\/li><li>03\/09\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=5889>A Free Audio-CASI Module for LimeSurvey<\/a><\/li><li>09\/07\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=5099>Simultaneous Raking of Survey Weights at Multiple Levels<\/a><\/li><li>12\/06\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=5431>E-Appointments in Empirical Field Research<\/a><\/li><li>11\/06\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=6967>Self-identification of occupation in web surveys: requirements for search trees and look-up tables<\/a><\/li><li>16\/04\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=5127>How to weight survey data with a dyadic multi-actor design?<\/a><\/li><li>20\/02\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=6688>Special issue: \u2018Weighting: Practical Issues and \u2018How to\u2019 Approach<\/a><\/li><li>20\/02\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=4919>The Impact of Typical Survey Weighting Adjustments on the Design Effect: A Case Study<\/a><\/li><li>20\/02\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=5291>Weighting Procedures for Dual Frame Telephone Surveys: A Case Study in Egypt<\/a><\/li><li>20\/02\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=5353>Computing Sampling Weights in Large-Scale Assessments in Education<\/a><\/li><li>20\/02\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=5108>Finding Respondents in the Forest: A Comparison of Logistic Regression and Random Forest Models for Response Propensity Weighting and Stratification<\/a><\/li><li>20\/02\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=6255>Why We Should Put Some Weight on Weights.<\/a><\/li><li>20\/02\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=3543>Should Recall of Previous Votes Be Used to Adjust Estimates of Voting Intention?<\/a><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">2014<\/h2><ul><li>12\/12\/14<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=5317>Data Collection Mode Effects On Political Knowledge<\/a><\/li><li>29\/08\/14<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=4563>Consumers\u2019 Recording Behaviour in Payment Diaries \u2013 Empirical Evidence from Germany<\/a><\/li><li>17\/07\/14<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=4292>Costs and benefits of reaching parents for survey participation through school communication systems: testing the potential of a straightforward convenience sample<\/a><\/li><li>26\/06\/14<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=1974>Fieldwork Monitoring in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE)<\/a><\/li><li>06\/06\/14<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=4350>Does the Choice of Header Images influence Responses? Findings from a Web Survey on Students\u2019 Housing Situation<\/a><\/li><li>23\/05\/14<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=3629>The impact of contact effort on mode-specific selection and measurement bias<\/a><\/li><li>30\/04\/14<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=3008>Merchant Steering of Consumer Payment Choice: Lessons Learned From Consumer Surveys<\/a><\/li><li>05\/02\/14<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=3723>Collecting saliva samples for DNA extraction from children and parents: findings from a pilot study using lay interviewers in the UK<\/a><\/li><li>13\/01\/14<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=2914>Asking Survey Respondents about Reasons for Their Behavior: A Split Ballot Experiment in Ethiopia<\/a><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">2013<\/h2><ul><li>22\/11\/13<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=2991>Challenges in the Treatment of Unit Nonresponse for Selected Business Surveys: A Case Study<\/a><\/li><li>07\/08\/13<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=2330>Good questions, bad questions? A Post-Survey Evaluation Strategy Based on Item Nonresponse.<\/a><\/li><li>12\/07\/13<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=2151>Developing a Master Sample Design for Household Surveys in Developing Countries: A Case Study in Bangladesh<\/a><\/li><li>08\/05\/13<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=1731>Research Note: Reducing the Threat of Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys?<\/a><\/li><li>05\/04\/13<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=2016>Reincarnation Revisited. Question format and the distribution of belief in reincarnation in survey research<\/a><\/li><li>01\/03\/13<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=1741>A Comparison of Results from a Spanish and English Mail Survey: Effects of Instruction Placement on Item Missingness<\/a><\/li><li>01\/03\/13<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=1063>Response Latency Measurement in Surveys. Detecting Strong Attitudes and Response Effects<\/a><\/li><li>31\/01\/13<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=1019>Prevalence of Cell Phone Sharing<\/a><\/li><li>31\/01\/13<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=161>Understanding and Improving the External Survey Environment of Official Statistics<\/a><\/li><li>25\/01\/13<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=828>Coverage Bias in European Telephone Surveys: Developments of Landline and Mobile Phone Coverage across Countries and over Time<\/a><\/li><li>23\/01\/13<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=817>Measuring Interviewer Characteristics Pertinent to Social Surveys: A Conceptual Framework<\/a><\/li><\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":951,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":2,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-14139","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/14139","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/951"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14139"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/14139\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22043,"href":"https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/14139\/revisions\/22043"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14139"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}