{"id":14139,"date":"2020-05-14T01:19:05","date_gmt":"2020-05-14T00:19:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?page_id=14139"},"modified":"2026-03-17T13:06:18","modified_gmt":"2026-03-17T12:06:18","slug":"archives","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?page_id=14139","title":{"rendered":"Archive"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2 class=\"archive-title\">Volume 4, issue 2 (2026)<\/h2><ul><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=21318>Can we understand persons\u2019 postponement in web surveys? Results from communication experiments in the Netherlands.<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Janelle van den Heuvel | Danielle Groffen | Michelle Creemers | Vivian Meertens | Maaike Kompier<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=22000>Comparing panel retention among Ukrainian and other refugees in a German probability-based panel: Evidence from a decomposition analysis<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Johannes Sch\u00fctt | Elena Sommer<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=21902>Comparing the \u2018Most Important Problem\u2019 Measure of Issue Salience and Google Trends: Methodological Lessons from the Field<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Julia Weiss | Barbara Binder<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=20303>Change of mode, change of bias? An analysis of differences in migrant survey participation following mode changes in the Austrian Social Survey (SSA) and the Austrian segment of the European Social Survey (ESS)<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Nikita Kvir | Dimitri Prandner<\/span><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">Volume 4, issue 1 (2026)<\/h2><ul><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=21395>Should We Worry About Problematic Response Behaviour in Social Media Surveys? Understanding the Impact of Social Group Cues in Recruitment<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Zaza Zindel<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=21010>From Face-to-Face to Push-to-Web: Methodological Lessons from the Transition of the \u201cSocial Survey Austria&#8221;<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Matthias Penker | Anja Eder | Markus Hadler<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=21234>Effects of QR codes in a political science probability-based web survey<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Oliver Lipps | Anke Tresch | Louis Durussel<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=20647>Who are the online panelists and why they cannot represent the general population<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">St\u00e9phane Legleye | Guillaume Chauvet | Thomas Merly-Alpa | No\u00e9mie Soullier<\/span><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">Volume 3, issue 3 (2025): Special issue \"Advancing Comparative Research: Exploring Error and Quality Indicators in Social Research\"<\/h2><ul><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=21974>Editorial \u2013 Advancing Comparative Research: Toward a Methodological Framework for Valid Comparative Inference<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Heinz Leitg\u00f6b | Stefanie Kley | Katharina Meitinger | Natalja Menold<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=20144>Measurement Invariance and Maximal Reliability: Exploring a Potential Link<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Tenko Raykov  | Natalja Menold <\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=20179>The Relationship Between Measurement Error, Representation Bias, Language, and Country: A Comparative Analysis Using the European Social Survey (Rounds 5 to 7)<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Lydia Repke | Barbara Felderer<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=19796>A myriad of options: Validity and comparability of alternative international education variables<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Silke L. Schneider | Julian Urban<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=20280>The MAUP Effect: Spatial Scale and the Reliability of Segregation Indices<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Hinrich Wildfang<\/span><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">Volume 3, issue 2 (2025)<\/h2><ul><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=21128>Challenges Conducting Cognitive Interviews in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Case Study with Older Adults in Lebanon<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Alexandra Abi Nassif  | Mayssan Kabalan | Carlos Mendes de Leon | Julie de Jong | Frederick Conrad * |  | * Corresponding author | Note: A. Abi Nassif & M. Kabalan contributed equally to this work.<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=20106>Mitigating Fraud in Incentivized Online Surveys: Lessons from Facebook Recruitment in Nigeria<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Arnim Langer | Lucas Leopold | Bart Meuleman | Line Kuppens | Abhishegh Menon<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=20596>Examining Predictors of Unsuccessful Mail Delivery for a National Address-Based Sample During the COVID-19 Pandemic<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Raphael Nishimura | Rebecca Gatward | Brady T. West | Htay-Wah Saw<\/span><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">Volume 3, issue 1 (2025)<\/h2><ul><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=20157>Does matching interviewer and respondent gender improve data quality and reduce social desirability bias? Evidence from a mobile phone survey in India<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Payal Hathi | Diane Coffey | Amit Thorat | Amanda Nagle<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=20208>Who chooses a QR code over a URL to access a web screener in a national probability survey of older adults, and the impact on data quality<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Andrew L. Hupp | Heather M. Schroeder | Brady T. West | Eva Leissou | David R. Weir<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=19802>Effects of mode and incentives on response rate, sample composition, and costs \u2013 experience from a self-administered mixed-mode survey of movers<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Manuela Schmidt | Alice Barth | J\u00f6rg Blasius<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=19898>Is it Helpful to Include QR Codes on Mail Contact Materials for Self-Administered Web Surveys?<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Taylor Lewis | Nicole Lee | Dain Palmer | Hannah Matzke | Nik Prachand<\/span><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">Volume 2, issue 2 (2024)<\/h2><ul><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=19515>The Effect of Operationalization on the Correlation between Objective and Subjective Socioeconomic Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Luise Richter | Natalja Menold<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=16162>Using surveys to assess students&#8217; political knowledge: Evidence of a gender gap or disparate response styles?<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Christa E. Winkler<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=19389>The Effect of Quick Response (QR) Codes on Response Rates and Respondent Composition: Results from a Statewide Experiment<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Kyle Endres | Erin O. Heiden | Ki Park<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=19354>Time and sample quality in a Facebook ad-generated survey with Polish migrants in the UK<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Aneta Piekut | <\/span><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">Volume 2, issue 1 (2024)<\/h2><ul><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=19071>Do Question Topic and Placement Shape Survey Breakoff Rates?<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Luke Plutowski | Elizabeth J. Zechmeister<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=18408>Asking Volunteers: Pitfalls and Solutions for Surveying Voluntary Organisations in Germany<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Christoph Thewes<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=19154>Ten Hypotheses Generated for Increasing Survey Response Propensity Among Immigrants and Inhabitants of Socially Disadvantaged Areas<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Nora Theorin | Sebastian Lundmark<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=18437>Designing Effective Mobile Phone Surveys: Insights from Mozambique on Optimizing Call Attempts and Evaluating Response, Refusal, and Contact Rates among Refugees and Asylum Seekers<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Ilgi Bozdag | Hyunju Park<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=18357>A Multimode Strategy to Contact Participants and Collect Responses in a Supplement to a Longitudinal Household Survey<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Angie Kistler | Sandra Decker | Darby Steiger | Jessica Novik<\/span><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">Volume 1, issue 3 (2023): Special issue on Food Acquisition Research and Methods<\/h2><ul><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=19311>Editorial: Recent Advances in Survey Methods for Collecting Food Data<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Elina T. Page | Christopher Antoun | Jeffrey Gonzalez | Linda Kantor | Florian Keusch | Lauren Miller | Alexander Wenz<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=17488>Usability of Augmented-Reality Portion Estimators During 24-hour Dietary Recall Interviews<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Laura DiGrande | Shawn Karns | Elizabeth Kinyara | Sue Pedrazzani<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=17465>Secondary Activities: Their Proximity to Primary Activities and Their Importance for Understanding Reports of Preparing and Consuming Meals<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Robert G. Rinderknecht | Long Doan | Liana C. Sayer<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=17458>Review of Food Diaries Used to Collect Food Acquisition Data<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Ting Yan | Janice Machado<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=17190>Exploring Optical Character Recognition (OCR) as a Method of Capturing Data from Food-Purchase Receipts<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Adam Kaderabek<\/span><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">Volume 1, issue 2 (2023)<\/h2><ul><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=18071>Willingness to Consent to Data Linkage in Austria \u2013 Results of a Pilot Study on Hypothetical Willingness for Different Domains<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Johann Bacher<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=18404>Targeting Incentives in Mature Probability-based Online Panels<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Oliver Lipps | Max Felder | Lukas Lauener | Anna Meisser | Nicolas Pekari | Line Rennwald | Anke Tresch<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=17319>Challenges in sampling students with and without special educational needs in inclusive settings for an educational longitudinal study<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Monja Schmitt | Cornelia Gresch | Amelie Labsch<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=18304>Predicting panel attrition using multiple operationalisations of response time<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Isabella Minderop<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=17985>Flying blind: Survey research among methadone and buprenorphine providers in Arizona<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Brady Benjamin | Meyerson Beth E. | Bentele Keith G. | *Corresponding author\r<\/span><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">Volume 1, issue 1 (2023)<\/h2><ul><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=17948>Questionnaire design in the FReDA panel recruitment: Challenges in transitioning from a face-to-face to a self-administered mixed-mode design<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Lisa Schmid | Tanja Kunz | Elias Naumann<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=17866>Design of multiple open-ended probes in cognitive online pretests using web probing<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Cornelia Neuert | Timo Lenzner<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=17502>Does the type of return postage affect response rates in follow-up mailings? Experimental findings from a citizen satisfaction survey<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Russell E. Ward<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=16770>Presentation Format Differences in Factorial Surveys: Written Vignettes Versus Photo Vignettes<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Stefanie Eifler | Knut Petzold | Miryam Verbeek-Teres<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=16640>Satisficing Behaviour in Web Surveys. Results from a Comparison of Web and Paper Mode across Four National Survey Experiments<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Sanne Lund Clement | Majbritt Kappelgaard Severin-Nielsen | Ditte Shamshiri-Petersen<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=15753>The Randomized Overclaiming Method (ROME): A paradigm for assessing the validity of social desirability reduction techniques using objective measures<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Patrick Schnapp<\/span><\/li><li><a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=16532>The most successful interviewers in income questions: A SHARE study<\/a><br\/>- <span class=\"grey\">Cl\u00e1udia Cunha | Alice Delerue Matos | Gina Voss<\/span><\/li><\/ul>\n<h2 class=\"archive-title\">2022<\/h2><ul><li>22\/12\/22<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=16693>An overview of the scales&#8217; characteristics for 10 well-established face-to-face social science surveys<\/a><\/li><li>20\/12\/22<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=16480>Optimizing Advance Letters: Findings From a Cognitive Pretest<\/a><\/li><li>12\/12\/22<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=17115>Cost Efficiency of Incentives in Mature Probability-based Online Panels<\/a><\/li><li>08\/12\/22<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=16622>Are you listening? Examining the level of multitasking and distractions and their impact on data quality in a telephone survey<\/a><\/li><li>06\/12\/22<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=16588>Binary response format or 11-point scale? Measuring justice evaluations of earnings in the SOEP<\/a><\/li><li>28\/11\/22<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=17134>An Experiment Comparing Concurrent and Sequential Choice+ Mixed-Mode Data Collection Protocols in a Self-Administered Health Survey<\/a><\/li><li>22\/09\/22<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=16931>Family Forms Survey: Identifying Donor-Conceived Offspring, Donors, and Recipients in a National Panel<\/a><\/li><li>29\/03\/22<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=15979>The effect of advance letters on survey participation: The case of Ireland and the European Social Survey<\/a><\/li><li>25\/01\/22<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=16730>Measurement Challenges in Designing and Conducting Surveys on Urban Population: Experience from Bangladesh Urban Health Surveys<\/a><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">2021<\/h2><ul><li>12\/10\/21<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=14864>Revisiting the ESS R8 sample a year after &#8211; Lessons from a re-contact survey to test patterns of unit non-response in Hungary<\/a><\/li><li>01\/10\/21<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=15407>Respondent Understanding of Data Linkage Consent<\/a><\/li><li>30\/08\/21<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=15510>How does switching a Probability-Based Online Panel to a Smartphone-Optimized Design Affect Response Rates and Smartphone Use?<\/a><\/li><li>14\/06\/21<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=14270>Using Record Linkage to improve matching rates of subject-generated ID-codes \u2013 A practical example from a panel study in schools<\/a><\/li><li>07\/06\/21<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=15306>The Interviewer Performance Profile (IPP): A Paradata-Driven Tool for Monitoring and Managing Interviewer Performance<\/a><\/li><li>28\/05\/21<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=15709>Integrating online data collection in a household panel study: effects on second-wave participation<\/a><\/li><li>18\/05\/21<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=15281>Sequentially mixing modes in an election survey<\/a><\/li><li>17\/05\/21<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=14494>Shaking hands in a busy waiting room. The effects of the surveyor\u2019s introduction and people present in the waiting room on the response rate<\/a><\/li><li>12\/02\/21<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=14216>Do shorter stated survey length and inclusion of a QR code in an invitation letter lead to better response rates?<\/a><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">2020<\/h2><ul><li>10\/12\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=14659>Multi-mode question pretesting: Using traditional cognitive interviews and online testing as complementary methods<\/a><\/li><li>10\/12\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13405>Using Geofences to Collect Survey Data: Lessons Learned From the IAB-SMART Study<\/a><\/li><li>10\/12\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13330>Collecting and using always-on location data in surveys<\/a><\/li><li>10\/12\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13446>Page switching in mixed-device web surveys: prevalence and data quality<\/a><\/li><li>10\/12\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13585>Device effects on survey response quality. A comparison of smartphone, tablet and PC responses on a cross sectional probability sample<\/a><\/li><li>10\/12\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13551>Text Message (SMS) Pre-notifications, Invitations and Reminders for Web Surveys<\/a><\/li><li>10\/12\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13426>Comparison of Quarterly and Yearly Calibration Data for Propensity Score Adjusted Web Survey Estimates<\/a><\/li><li>10\/12\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13558>Using Facebook and Instagram to Recruit Web Survey Participants: A Step-by-Step Guide and Application<\/a><\/li><li>10\/12\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=15106>Editorial: From web surveys to mobile web to apps, sensors, and digital traces<\/a><\/li><li>10\/12\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=15174>Special issue: Advancements in Online and Mobile Survey Methods<\/a><\/li><li>24\/11\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=14420>Letting the cat out of the bag: The impact of respondent multitasking on disclosure of socially undesirable information and answers to knowledge questions<\/a><\/li><li>15\/10\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13652>Just a Difficult Election to Poll? How Context Affects Polling Accuracy<\/a><\/li><li>31\/08\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13478>Do supplemental list frames for subpopulations increase subpopulation sampling efficiency? Evidence from the National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey<\/a><\/li><li>23\/07\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13357>Assessing Nonresponse Bias by Permitting Individuals to Opt Out of a Survey<\/a><\/li><li>07\/07\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13222>The Impact of Nurse Continuity on Biosocial Survey Participation<\/a><\/li><li>18\/05\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13996>Special issue: Fieldwork Monitoring Strategies for Interviewer-Administered Surveys<\/a><\/li><li>18\/05\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=13732>Fieldwork Monitoring Strategies for Interviewer-Administered Surveys<\/a><\/li><li>18\/05\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=12401>Using Geospatial Data to Monitor and Optimize Face-to-Face Fieldwork<\/a><\/li><li>18\/05\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=11714>Developments in fieldwork procedures and monitoring in longitudinal surveys: case prioritisation and electronic contact sheets on the UK Millennium Cohort Study<\/a><\/li><li>18\/05\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=12720>Using field monitoring strategies to improve panel sample representativeness: Application during data collection in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE)<\/a><\/li><li>18\/05\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=11703>Converting Nonrespondents in PIAAC Germany 2012 Using Responsive Measures<\/a><\/li><li>18\/05\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=11849>The utility of auxiliary data for survey response modeling: Evidence from the German Internet Panel<\/a><\/li><li>18\/05\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=11866>Improving Central Monitoring of Fieldwork in Cross-national Surveys: The Case of the Fieldwork Management System in the European Social Survey<\/a><\/li><li>18\/05\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=12237>Fieldwork Monitoring in Practice:  Insights from 17 Large-scale Social Science Surveys in Germany<\/a><\/li><li>05\/03\/20<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=12496>Method and transparency of online physician surveys: an overview<\/a><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">2019<\/h2><ul><li>22\/10\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=12538>Effective Strategies for Recording Interviewer Observations:  Evidence from the PASS Study in Germany<\/a><\/li><li>15\/08\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=12603>Analysing Poor Reading Skills: A Comparison Between PIAAC Literacy Levels and Reading components<\/a><\/li><li>17\/05\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=12423>Comparison response patterns on landline and cell phone in a call back survey: effects of demographic characteristics and lag days<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=11275>Undercoverage of the elderly institutionalized population: The risk of biased estimates and the potentials of weighting<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=11822>How to reach \u2018hard-to-reach\u2019 older people for research: The TIBaR model of recruitment<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=11064>Interviewing elderly in nursing homes \u2013 Respondent and survey characteristics as predictors of item nonresponse<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10841>Effects of a sequential mixed-mode design on participation, contact and sample composition \u2013 Results of the pilot study \u201cIMOA &#8211; Improving Health Monitoring in Old Age\u201d<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10807>Including nursing home residents in a general population health survey in Germany<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=11416>Sampling in Times of High Immigration: The Survey Process of the IAB-BAMF-SOEP Survey of Refugees<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=12000>How to Implement Respondent-Driven Sampling in Practice: Insights from Surveying 24-Hour Migrant Home Care Workers<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10741>Sampling Refugees for an Educational Longitudinal Survey<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10641>Building a Sampling Frame for Migrant Populations via an Onomastic Approach \u2013 Lesson learned from the Austrian Immigrant Survey 2016<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10780>Integration of Migrant Populations into Health Monitoring in Germany: Results from a Feasibility Study<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10812>From peer to peer: Reaching migrants from sub-Saharan Africa with research on sexual health utilizing community-based participatory health research<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=11959>Needles in Haystacks and Diamonds in the Rough: Using Probability and Nonprobability Methods to Survey Low-incidence Populations<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10433>Measuring sexual behaviours and attitudes in hard-to-reach groups. A comparison of a non-probability web survey with a national probability sample survey<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10981>Possible Uses of Nonprobability Sampling for the Social Sciences<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=11203>Inferences based on Probability Sampling or Nonprobability Sampling \u2013 Are They Nothing but a Question of Models?<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=12070>Probability and Nonprobability Sampling: Representative Surveys of hard-to-reach and hard-to-ask populations. Current surveys between the poles of theory and practice<\/a><\/li><li>02\/04\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=12100>Special issue: &#8216;Probability and Nonprobability Sampling: Sampling of hard-to-reach survey populations&#8217;<\/a><\/li><li>22\/03\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10323>Pouring water into wine: revisiting the advantages of the crosswise model for asking sensitive questions<\/a><\/li><li>22\/02\/19<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10663>Trust and Credibility in the U.S. Federal Statistical System<\/a><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">2018<\/h2><ul><li>20\/12\/18<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10452>International Nonresponse Trends across Countries and Years: An analysis of 36 years of Labour Force Survey data<\/a><\/li><li>16\/11\/18<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10422>Validating occupational coding indexes for use in multi-country surveys<\/a><\/li><li>15\/11\/18<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10945>Investigating Respondent Multitasking and Distraction Using Self-reports and Interviewers\u2019 Observations in a Dual-frame Telephone Survey<\/a><\/li><li>27\/07\/18<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=10051>Evaluation of Gaining Cooperation Methods for IVR Surveys in Low- and Middle-income Countries<\/a><\/li><li>18\/05\/18<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=9734>Collecting Multiple Data Linkage Consents in a Mixed-mode Survey: Evidence from a large-scale longitudinal study in the UK<\/a><\/li><li>20\/04\/18<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=9673>Response Rates in the European Social Survey: Increasing, Decreasing, or a Matter of Fieldwork Efforts?<\/a><\/li><li>15\/03\/18<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=9237>\u2018Don\u2019t Know\u2019 Responses to Survey Items on Trust in Police and Criminal Courts: A Word of Caution<\/a><\/li><li>23\/01\/18<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=9435>The Need to Account for Complex Sampling Features when Analyzing Establishment Survey Data:  An Illustration using the 2013 Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey (BRDIS)<\/a><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">2017<\/h2><ul><li>07\/12\/17<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=8195>Why were there three? &#8211; Determinants of the presence of an intimate partner during face-to-face interviews<\/a><\/li><li>01\/12\/17<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=8625>A Review of Reporting Standards in Academic Journals \u2013   A Research Note<\/a><\/li><li>16\/11\/17<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=8217>Does name order still matter for candidates in a presidential primary poll in the US? Lack of response order effect in a web survey experiment<\/a><\/li><li>10\/10\/17<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=8480>Measuring Immigrant Populations: Subjective versus Objective Assessments<\/a><\/li><li>21\/09\/17<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=9044>Effects of call patterns on the likelihood of contact and of interview in mobile CATI surveys<\/a><\/li><li>24\/08\/17<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=8708>Comparing Continuous and Dichotomous Scoring of Social Desirability Scales: Effects of Different Scoring Methods on the Reliability and Validity of the Winkler-Kroh-Spiess BIDR Short Scale<\/a><\/li><li>16\/05\/17<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=8887>Testing the Validity of the Crosswise Model: A Study on Attitudes Towards Muslims<\/a><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">2016<\/h2><ul><li>06\/12\/16<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=7860>Nonsampling errors and their implication for estimates of current cancer treatment using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey<\/a><\/li><li>01\/11\/16<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=7645>Question Order Experiments in the German-European Context<\/a><\/li><li>06\/10\/16<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=7587>The effect of interviewers\u2019 motivation and attitudes on respondents\u2018 consent to contact secondary respondents in a multi-actor design<\/a><\/li><li>01\/07\/16<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=7794>A Case Study of Error in Survey Reports of Move Month Using the U.S. Postal Service Change of Address Records<\/a><\/li><li>08\/06\/16<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=7430>Measuring the survey climate: the Flemish case<\/a><\/li><li>17\/05\/16<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=7650>Web survey experiments on fully balanced, minimally balanced and unbalanced rating scales<\/a><\/li><li>09\/05\/16<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=7031>Comparing smartphones to tablets for face-to-face interviewing in Kenya<\/a><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">2015<\/h2><ul><li>18\/12\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=7324>Altering the Survey-taking Climate: The Case of the 2010 U.S. Census<\/a><\/li><li>20\/11\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=6899>What do web survey panel respondents answer when asked \u201cDo you have any other comment?\u201d<\/a><\/li><li>13\/11\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=7288>Obtaining Record Linkage Consent: Results from a Wording Experiment in Germany<\/a><\/li><li>03\/09\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=5889>A Free Audio-CASI Module for LimeSurvey<\/a><\/li><li>09\/07\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=5099>Simultaneous Raking of Survey Weights at Multiple Levels<\/a><\/li><li>12\/06\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=5431>E-Appointments in Empirical Field Research<\/a><\/li><li>11\/06\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=6967>Self-identification of occupation in web surveys: requirements for search trees and look-up tables<\/a><\/li><li>16\/04\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=5127>How to weight survey data with a dyadic multi-actor design?<\/a><\/li><li>20\/02\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=6688>Special issue: \u2018Weighting: Practical Issues and \u2018How to\u2019 Approach<\/a><\/li><li>20\/02\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=4919>The Impact of Typical Survey Weighting Adjustments on the Design Effect: A Case Study<\/a><\/li><li>20\/02\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=5291>Weighting Procedures for Dual Frame Telephone Surveys: A Case Study in Egypt<\/a><\/li><li>20\/02\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=5353>Computing Sampling Weights in Large-Scale Assessments in Education<\/a><\/li><li>20\/02\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=5108>Finding Respondents in the Forest: A Comparison of Logistic Regression and Random Forest Models for Response Propensity Weighting and Stratification<\/a><\/li><li>20\/02\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=6255>Why We Should Put Some Weight on Weights.<\/a><\/li><li>20\/02\/15<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=3543>Should Recall of Previous Votes Be Used to Adjust Estimates of Voting Intention?<\/a><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">2014<\/h2><ul><li>12\/12\/14<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=5317>Data Collection Mode Effects On Political Knowledge<\/a><\/li><li>29\/08\/14<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=4563>Consumers\u2019 Recording Behaviour in Payment Diaries \u2013 Empirical Evidence from Germany<\/a><\/li><li>17\/07\/14<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=4292>Costs and benefits of reaching parents for survey participation through school communication systems: testing the potential of a straightforward convenience sample<\/a><\/li><li>26\/06\/14<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=1974>Fieldwork Monitoring in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE)<\/a><\/li><li>06\/06\/14<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=4350>Does the Choice of Header Images influence Responses? Findings from a Web Survey on Students\u2019 Housing Situation<\/a><\/li><li>23\/05\/14<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=3629>The impact of contact effort on mode-specific selection and measurement bias<\/a><\/li><li>30\/04\/14<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=3008>Merchant Steering of Consumer Payment Choice: Lessons Learned From Consumer Surveys<\/a><\/li><li>05\/02\/14<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=3723>Collecting saliva samples for DNA extraction from children and parents: findings from a pilot study using lay interviewers in the UK<\/a><\/li><li>13\/01\/14<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=2914>Asking Survey Respondents about Reasons for Their Behavior: A Split Ballot Experiment in Ethiopia<\/a><\/li><\/ul><h2 class=\"archive-title\">2013<\/h2><ul><li>22\/11\/13<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=2991>Challenges in the Treatment of Unit Nonresponse for Selected Business Surveys: A Case Study<\/a><\/li><li>07\/08\/13<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=2330>Good questions, bad questions? A Post-Survey Evaluation Strategy Based on Item Nonresponse.<\/a><\/li><li>12\/07\/13<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=2151>Developing a Master Sample Design for Household Surveys in Developing Countries: A Case Study in Bangladesh<\/a><\/li><li>08\/05\/13<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=1731>Research Note: Reducing the Threat of Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys?<\/a><\/li><li>05\/04\/13<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=2016>Reincarnation Revisited. Question format and the distribution of belief in reincarnation in survey research<\/a><\/li><li>01\/03\/13<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=1741>A Comparison of Results from a Spanish and English Mail Survey: Effects of Instruction Placement on Item Missingness<\/a><\/li><li>01\/03\/13<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=1063>Response Latency Measurement in Surveys. Detecting Strong Attitudes and Response Effects<\/a><\/li><li>31\/01\/13<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=1019>Prevalence of Cell Phone Sharing<\/a><\/li><li>31\/01\/13<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=161>Understanding and Improving the External Survey Environment of Official Statistics<\/a><\/li><li>25\/01\/13<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=828>Coverage Bias in European Telephone Surveys: Developments of Landline and Mobile Phone Coverage across Countries and over Time<\/a><\/li><li>23\/01\/13<a href=https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/?p=817>Measuring Interviewer Characteristics Pertinent to Social Surveys: A Conceptual Framework<\/a><\/li><\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":951,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":2,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-14139","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/14139","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/951"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14139"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/14139\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22043,"href":"https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/14139\/revisions\/22043"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/surveyinsights.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14139"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}